If
Laurencia Bernard knew that her new boss was having affairs with both the landlord and
his son, if Laurencia had any indication about a prominent Martinique Mayor
turned legislator, a continental French official and a Trinidad-based Lucian
who wife gave him a botin, she said nothing about it and did not make it an
issue as tensions rose between her and the boss.
Even if those
things were true, what bearing would they have on the professional relationship
between a house slave and a field hand, anyway?
To this day,
no amount of prodding can get Laurencia to utter a word about her former boss’
personal, but well-scandalized and rumor-mongered life.
The first
time Walcott asked Laurencia for the keys to the residence was in October of
2012. Walcott said it was for a guest. Laurencia forgot to leave the keys, but
the guest never arrived anyway, so, whatever.
The following
November, Laurencia took two weeks vacation. On the first Monday of her
vacation, Walcott called to say she needed the keys. Why she didn’t just cut
new copies (or perhaps change the locks, if she wanted to keep someone out) is
still beyond anyone.
The following
day, one of the office staff called asking for the keys again. Walcott
apparently needed those particular copies of the key rather urgently.
Unfortunately for them, Laurencia was not five minutes away at her home but
many miles away in the countryside. She told them, in the parlance of good
French unionists, to stop harassing her.
Walcott,
herself, left a terse message on voicemail: “I need my keys for my house and I
need the keys to my gate.”
The next
morning the keys were delivered.
“I gave the
keys to Ali,” Laurencia has testified, referring to Walcott’s St Lucian
boyfriend.
“I don’t
understand why she has to be so,” Ali reportedly told Laurencia about his
girlfriend.
There was
also another incident in early November when Walcott had a visitor named Olaf
whom she left at the residence when she went to St Lucia.
When she
returned, Olaf had already departed.
As she returned
to the residence, she reportedly worried that, “I hope Laurencia didn’t drink my
Hennessey.”
“There’s
Hennessey in the house?” Laurencia relied.
“Let me see,”
Walcott reportedy continued. “You see the same thing. She drank my Hennessey.”
“How do you
know she drank it?” her nanny inquired. “How do you know any is missing?”
“Because I
marked it.”
How very
early 19th century.
It was two
weeks later when she finally got the keys while Laurencia was on vacation.
With the
battle for the keys won, there was only one more confrontation left for the
house slave and the field hand.
Near the end
of December, Laurencia was told that it made no sense for her to go to work
because Walcott would be spending the holidays in St Lucia and there would be
no one home anyway.
A couple of
days later, the driver called to say that Walcott changed her mind and that
Laurencia had to report to work on the Friday following.
Laurencia
was not understanding. She had already made plans with her family and for
personal business that could not be done while she was at work. She complained
that asking to return on short notice when there was no one in the house anyway
was unfair and unwarranted.
Laurencia
went back to work when Walcott went back to work.
Then came
the end game.
Four days
passed before the house slave summoned her field hand to demand why her orders
had been not just disobeyed, but disregarded. The field hand replied that she
doesn’t work for or take orders from the driver or anyone else. Laurencia
pointed out that she had, in fact, obeyed the last direct order of her boss,
the Consular General, Yasmine Walcott, which was to not to come to the house while
the boss is away.
“You want to
me to issue every order to you myself,” came the reply. “I told you already, I’m
a busy woman. I don’t have time to talk to you. If I give you orders through
others, you have to obey them.”
Laurencia
was not impressed with the logic.
“I work
under you. Not anybody else. How hard was it to call me yourself?”
That meeting
turned into a confrontation and the confrontation turned into a meltdown on the
part of both Yasmine and Laurencia. Yasmine ordered Laurencia to take leave and
not to come back.
Laurencia
replied, “Is not so it going, my girl…”
She knew
that Yasmine was operating as though she was in St Lucia or America or one of
those backward countries where workers rights are trampled on as a matter of
mere expediency. Laurencia knew that she had a contract , a union and most
importantly, she was in France, where shit like that don’t fly.
That
happened on a Wednesday.
By the
Friday, Laurencia had issued a letter stating that not only did she fully
expect to still have her job, but she expected to get full salary, including
the days when Yasmine sent her on leave and then changed her mind on short
notice.
At the gates
of the residence, Laurencia must have spoken to Ali and Yasmine’s nanny for an
hour about the incident. They both knew that Yasmine was making a mistake,
digging a potentially deep hole. But they were not allowed to let Laurencia
into the house.
Laurencia
was informed that there was some correspondence for her at the office. It was
the beginning of the end.
Except that
Yasmine Walcott has delayed talking to Laurencia’s union so much that the union
advised Laurencia to abandon mediation and just sue the bitch.
Many months
later, Laurencia is still deeply embittered by the entire fiasco. Less than two weeks ago (Sunday, June 9th)
she found herself heckling Yasmine during a speech to a Lucian association in
Laba.
“Don’t
listen to anything that woman tells you,” she shouted while sitting in the
audience. “Whatever comes out of her mouth doesn’t mean anything.”
In addition
to other assorted flavors of insult and criticism.
The event
was over for almost 18 hours when the police showed up at Laurencia’s door and
arrested her for endangering the life of Yasmine Walcott on the La Rocarde
highway.
“She said I
was zigzagging in front of her as though I wanted to cause an accident.”
Laurencia,
meanwhile, claims to have witnesses and an alibi that she was far, far away
from where Yasmine says she was at the time.
It’s a story
in which someone is lying. Maybe everyone is lying. But like they say in the
military, there are no bad soldiers, only bad generals.
In this
case, this one Consular General has attracted more negative attention to her person
and her office than any Lucian diplomat since Charles Fleming of the UN Funds
Scandal fame.
The main
difference between Fleming and Walcott right now is that when Fleming did his
do, someone benefitted, for better or
worse. In this case, no one benefits and a young woman who was in a position to
be light and a guide to other young women has engineered her own fall to
disgrace and ignominy, all without having a single success to balance out her
sullied legacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment